Deench

Everything for Everyone

Dept. of Energy extracts hydrocarbons from sea, sequesters CO2 in Davy Jones’ locker

Today, the US Department of Energy announced it had successfully completed a test project that extracted a usable fuel (methane) from its resting place in ocean sediments. The test, performed in conjunction with ConocoPhillips and a Japanese team, could potentially point the way toward a vast new supply of energy. And by linking the extraction with carbon sequestration, the DOE might have found a way to add more hydrocarbons to the world's energy budget without exacerbating climate change.

The material in question is methane hydrates (also called clathrates). These form at high pressure in water, which forms a cage-like structure around pockets of methane. Although these remain solid even above the freezing point of water, changes in pressure and temperature can melt them, releasing methane and returning the water to a liquid state. Clathrate deposits are estimated to be massive. If they can be extracted successfully, they would add a significant boost to the world's hydrocarbon reserves.

The recently completed project, which took place off the coast of Alaska, is a test to determine if we can do that. The extraction technique involves lowering the pressure at the site of the deposit, allowing the methane to escape. At the same time, liquid CO2 was pumped in to occupy the space that held the clathrate. At the pressures prevalent at the site, the CO2 should remain liquid, held under the sediments that once trapped the methane.

There are some big questions that will require followup work—does the process release methane that escapes into the atmosphere? Does the CO2 remain in place long enough that we can consider it sequestered? To get answers to those questions, the DOE has allocated another $6.5 million to further tests, and is requesting $5 million in next year's budget.

Read the comments on this post


Dept. of Energy extracts fuel from the sea floor

Today, the US Department of Energy announced it had successfully completed a test project that extracted a usable fuel (methane) from its resting place in ocean sediments. The test, performed in conjunction with ConocoPhillips and a Japanese team, could potentially point the way toward a vast new supply of energy. And by linking the extraction with carbon sequestration, the DOE might have found a way to add more hydrocarbons to the world's energy budget without exacerbating climate change.

The material in question is methane hydrates (also called clathrates). These form at high pressure in water, which forms a cage-like structure around pockets of methane. Although these remain solid even above the freezing point of water, changes in pressure and temperature can melt them, releasing methane and returning the water to a liquid state. Clathrate deposits are estimated to be massive. If they can be extracted successfully, they would add a significant boost to the world's hydrocarbon reserves.

The recently completed project, which took place off the coast of Alaska, is a test to determine if we can do that. The extraction technique involves lowering the pressure at the site of the deposit, allowing the methane to escape. At the same time, liquid CO2 was pumped in to occupy the space that held the clathrate. At the pressures prevalent at the site, the CO2 should remain liquid.

Read more on Ars Technica&hellip


Test of 400 options shows we can save money while limiting climate change

If a group of scientists announced that reducing emissions of some pollutants would prevent global warming, it wouldn’t make headlines—we’ve been hearing that for years when the pollutant is carbon dioxide. However, if they added that those reduced emissions would also prevent millions of premature deaths per year and increase annual crop yields by tens to hundreds of millions of tons, you would probably take notice. But the part that will really blow your mind—and what might make some people reconsider their stance—is that all of this could be done at a profit.

A large group of scientists identified 14 emissions reduction measures—out of around 400 considered—that primarily reduce ozone and black carbon (BC; think soot) using existing technology. The study was authored by Drew Shindell, of NASA Goddard and Columbia University, who had 23 coauthors from a total of 13 different institutions around the world (from countries including the US, UK, Italy, Austria, Thailand, and Kenya). The group concluded that the economic benefits of improved air quality and diminished global warming exceed the typical costs of these 14 approaches.

Read the rest of this article...

Read the comments on this post